![]() In a large state that already has many electoral votes, these extra two may not particularly affect the ratio of electoral votes per person. However, every state has exactly two senators so each state gets two additional electoral votes no matter its population. The portion of a state’s electoral votes based on that state’s representation in the House is approximately proportional to the state’s population (see earlier apportionment trivia to learn more.) Therefore, votes from large vs small states have the same effect on the Electoral College for this portion of electoral votes. In a presidential election, voters do not directly choose the president instead, statewide election results are interpreted through a state’s allocation of its electoral votes. history, there were 5 instances where the popular vote did not match the results from the electoral election (1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, 2016). In fact, under more reasonable assumptions, a candidate could become the president by winning only about 23% of the votes. ![]() ![]() Though this scenario is highly unlikely, this exercise shows the weakness of the Electoral College. In this instance, even if all of the remaining voting eligible people in the remaining 39 states (about 109,000,000 people) vote for an alternative candidate, the candidate with 11 votes would still win. This candidate then gets 270 electoral votes and wins the election. Now suppose only one person in each of those state votes, and they all vote for the same candidate. It turns out that this happens after 11 states. Add the electoral votes from the top until you get to 270. To see this, list the states according to the number of their electoral votes, starting with the highest (California). Under extremely hypothetical conditions, a candidate only needs 11 votes to win the presidency!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |